Welcome to a place of reflection!

After a number of years experiencing different roles in different industries, I have finally found my calling in life - providing a resource that promotes Christian values and ethics on the subject of business leadership. Herein you will find my personal views on the very popular subject of leadership within the workplace. The majority of what you will find on this website are articles that I have written which reference external publications to ensure that multiple perspectives have been considered. Naturally, I will reference the Holy Word of the Lord to illustrate that these principles have already been provided to us in the past. Put plainly - "the wise shall understand" (Daniel 12).

High Performance Management

In 2006 I carried out some research as part of my MBA to determine whether an individual could be both a leader and a manager (L+M) in today’s working environment? In addition, I also wanted to find out which of the three various management approaches (leader, manager or leader-manager) would most inspire employees?

Abstract

This dissertation research project examined the changes in management approaches over the last 30 odd years. It begins by setting the scene and explaining some of the trends that have caused the various changes over time. A detailed literature review was then conducted to evaluate and compare a variety of views of authors such as Zaleznik, Kotter, Mintzberg and the more recent views of Turk to name a few. During this review, an analysis of the differences between traits of leaders and managers was investigated. The various views were then critiqued and summarised.

Which leadership theory is best?

My speculation is that at one time of another you have come across the following phrases; “don’t make a bad situation into a worse situation”, “choice is the period between the situation and one’s reaction”; “you don’t put a fire out by pouring a bucket of petrol over it; “it was not my decision, he/she made me do it”. Or how often have you responded to an email by immediately responding with a heated email. In principle you would type your response, wait a day to give yourself the opportunity to calm down and read the email again before sending it if you still felt that strong about it – or deleting it? Unfortunately there are situations where heated discussions take place and one does not always have the opportunity to take this pause. It is this pause that choice actually occurs and one that effective leaders have come to learn and master; because there is always an alternative.

The five power bases of leadership

Power is “the ability to change the behavior of others” (Vecchio 2006: 124). How one chooses to use this power to influence others is dependant on one’s characteristics. There are five bases of power as describe by Vecchio (2006) and Hughes et al (2006). Expert power stems from an individual’s knowledge and experience of a particular subject. Referent power is born of the relationship between a leaders and followers. Legitimate power is usually appointed by way of role within a group or organization. Reward power refers to power that is gained from being able to reward followers with what they desire. Finally, coercive power is the power to punish (Vecchio 2006, Hughes et al 2006). A leader may be able to use a combination of these power bases. Others on the other hand may only be able to use one or two of these power bases.

Managing Change - "control" or "shaping" - which one are you?

Palmer et al (2006) states that change managers have a specific “image or mental model of what they think is achievable” (p. 9). Words such as “director, navigator, caretaker, coach, interpreter, and nurturer” (p. 24) may help in explaining how a change manager may consider their role within the change process. As indicated by various references we have read this week, there are numerous approaches to implementing change. But as Palmer et al (2006) points out, “we need to appreciate how our image both illuminate certain aspects of change and take us away from paying attention to other aspects” (p. 9). As demonstrated by the case studies in this week’s text, change must occur in order to stay competitive in today’s global arena. The digital age has made certain of this and organisations must adapt quickly to the opportunities it provides or they will die.

Three forms of incentives - achievement, affiliation and power!

Creating a benefit package to help motivate the work force is always going to be a challenge for any organisation.  With so many different “personality traits” (Vecchio 2006: 28), it is essential that any scheme is tailored correctly for a particular individual.  The rewards and benefits must meet the expectations of the recipient in either one, a combination, or all three of these forms; “the need for achievement, the need for affiliation, and the need for power” (Vecchio 2006: 73).  Understanding how individuals learn certain habits and characteristics will enable us to interpret these needs into rewards which will help to increase performance whether “intrinsic” (Vecchio 2006: 92) or “extrinsic” (ibid).

Syndicate content